Guidelines for the Reviewers
- Scope of Review – Accept a manuscript only if its subject matter matches your area of expertise.
- Conflict of Interest – Immediately disclose any personal or professional conflict that could affect an impartial assessment.
- Comprehensive Evaluation – Examine the paper in depth, focusing on:
- The significance of the research question.
- The appropriateness and rigor of the methodology.
- The reliability and reproducibility of the results.
- The clarity, grammar and overall presentation of the text.
- Whether the discussion appropriately interprets the findings and leads to meaningful, novel conclusions.
- Review Form – Use only the supplied review‑report template; no other formats are acceptable.
- Signature – Sign the completed Review Report Form with your name and, if required, your institutional affiliation.
- Quality Standard – Recommend for publication only those manuscripts that meet high‑quality research standards.
- Rejection Policy – Do not hesitate to reject papers that contain questionable data, flawed analyses, or unsupported interpretations.
- Discussion Strength – Ensure the discussion robustly supports the results, citing relevant and up‑to‑date literature.
- Plagiarism Check – Report any form of plagiarism you detect, no matter how minor.
- Timeliness – Submit your review by the deadline indicated in the invitation.